South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog

Miami Beach Scooter-Rental Injuries On The Rise: What Injured Riders Should Know

Published on: November 30, 2025 | by Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada, P.A.

Electric scooters surge in popularity every year as the holiday season approaches in Miami Beach. Tourists explore the city on rented scooters, locals rely on them for short trips, and sidewalks fill with riders who may have little experience navigating crowded beach corridors. A recent Local 10 News report described an incident in which a scooter rider struck a police officer on Miami Beach, raising concerns about safety, maintenance, and oversight. This trend reflects a larger pattern. You face real risks each time you rent a scooter in South Florida, and you need a clear understanding of how injury claims work when accidents happen.

Scooter crashes in Miami Beach often involve careless drivers, neglected maintenance, uneven pavement, and confusion about local rules. You benefit from knowing how rental companies, vehicle drivers, and property owners share responsibility when a ride ends suddenly with injuries.

How Scooter Accidents Increase During Miami’s Holiday Tourism Season

Miami Beach becomes especially busy from late November through early January. Visitors arrive from all over the country, many of whom are unfamiliar with the area’s traffic flow or inconsistent weather patterns. Streets around hotels, restaurants, bars, and shopping districts stay packed. Scooters fill gaps between buses and rideshares, creating fast movement within tight spaces.

Florida Property Owners’ Duty To Maintain Safe Conditions After A New Third DCA Ruling

Published on: November 17, 2025 | by Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada, P.A.

A new Florida Third District Court of Appeal decision offers valuable guidance for anyone injured on someone else’s property in Miami-Dade County. The case, Rodriguez v. Jaimes (Nov. 5, 2025), examined whether a property owner could avoid liability by claiming he no longer controlled the area where the injury occurred. The court rejected that argument and explained that Florida property owners cannot escape responsibility simply by distancing themselves from the condition that caused the harm. Incidents like this help clarify how negligence works in Florida premises cases and what victims must show to protect their rights.

Premises liability cases in South Florida involve slip-and-falls, unsafe walkways, collapsing structures, faulty lighting, and unsecured hazards. Property owners often argue that they lacked control, lacked knowledge, or lacked involvement in the event. The Third DCA’s recent analysis makes one point clear. Courts look closely at the total relationship between the owner and the property, not just the owner’s claims after the fact.

How Florida Courts View Control And Responsibility Over Property

Florida law requires property owners to maintain reasonably safe conditions for visitors. This duty applies whether the visitor enters a home, a business, a parking lot, or a rental property. The central question in many cases is control. When someone owns or occupies a space, courts expect that person to inspect for hazards and correct dangerous conditions.

2025–2026 Florida Workers’ Compensation Changes and What Injured Employees Should Know

Published on: November 10, 2025 | by Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada, P.A.

Florida workers face several important shifts in the workers’ compensation landscape heading into 2026. The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation recently approved a 6.9 percent rate decrease for workers’ compensation premiums, marking the ninth straight year of lower rates for employers. This change reflects statewide trends in claims, safety practices, and insurance costs. You still need a clear understanding of how these shifts affect wage-loss benefits, medical care, and claim handling in South Florida. Many workers seek legal guidance early in the process to avoid delays, missed documentation, or disputes with insurers.

Rate reductions may sound positive on paper, yet they also influence how insurers evaluate claims and manage medical authorizations. Understanding what changed for 2025–2026 helps you anticipate how your claim may unfold after a job injury in Miami, Broward, or the Keys.

How Florida’s 2026 Rate Reduction Fits Into The Broader System

Workers’ compensation rates determine the premiums that employers pay. Lower premiums can impact how insurers respond to claims, since each claim affects future costs. The 6.9 percent decrease for 2026 follows eight consecutive years of similar reductions. State regulators attribute these changes to fewer reported injuries in some industries, improved workplace safety programs, and stable costs for medical services covered by workers’ compensation.

Coconut Grove Wall Collapse And Florida Construction Worker Death Claims

Published on: November 4, 2025 | by Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada, P.A.

News outlets recently reported a deadly wall collapse at a Coconut Grove property that claimed the life of a 29-year-old construction worker and brought a large emergency response to the scene. Reports described a masonry wall giving way during ongoing work, trapping the worker under rubble while coworkers and first responders scrambled to reach him. Incidents like this raise immediate questions for families about financial support, workers’ compensation rights, and potential claims against companies that contributed to unsafe conditions. You need a clear picture of how Florida law treats fatal construction accidents involving structural failure.

In Florida, surviving family members typically look first to workers’ compensation death benefits, then explore whether a separate wrongful death claim exists against third parties such as property owners, general contractors, or engineering firms. The Coconut Grove collapse illustrates how both systems can come into play after a serious jobsite disaster.

Construction Site Wall Failures in South Florida

Masonry and concrete walls line many South Florida projects, from single-family remodels to significant commercial developments. A wall can fail when crews remove supports too early, excavate at the base without proper shoring, overload the structure with equipment, or work around a design that never accounted for actual loads. Weather can aggravate these risks when heavy rain saturates soil or high winds push against partially built structures.

Wrong-Way Car Crash in Florida Highlights Legal Questions After Fatal Collisions

Published on: October 31, 2025 | by Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada, P.A.

A tragic head-on crash in Florida drew national attention this month after an 18-year-old driver traveling the wrong way struck another vehicle, killing herself and leaving a 21-year-old father with severe injuries. The collision, reported by People.com on October 23, 2025, occurred on a divided highway late at night, underscoring the continuing danger of wrong-way driving across the state. Every year, dozens of Florida families face similar loss or catastrophic injury when a driver crosses into oncoming lanes.

When wrong-way crashes occur, victims and surviving families often face complex liability questions. Determining responsibility involves more than showing which car entered the opposing lane. Investigators must evaluate roadway design, signage visibility, lighting, and whether alcohol, fatigue, or distraction played a role. For those left behind, understanding the civil remedies available under Florida law is an essential first step toward recovery.

Legal Responsibility in Wrong-Way Collisions

Florida Rental Car Accidents And Your Rights With A Skilled Injury Attorney

Published on: October 22, 2025 | by Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada, P.A.

Tourists and business travelers drive Florida roads every day, which means rental cars show up in a high number of crashes. If a rented vehicle hits you, you likely wonder who pays and how to hold the right party accountable. Florida law handles vehicle ownership in a distinctive way, so you should act quickly and speak with an attorney who understands these cases. You can call Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada to discuss your options and protect your claim.

Why Rental Car Crashes Create Unique Legal Questions

Florida follows the dangerous instrumentality doctrine, which generally holds vehicle owners responsible for harm caused by someone they allow to drive. That rule sounds straightforward until a rental company enters the picture. A federal law known as the Graves Amendment shields rental companies from vicarious liability when a renter causes a crash. That protection does not cover every situation, though, which opens important paths for injured people to pursue recovery.

When A Rental Company Can Still Be Held Accountable

The Graves Amendment does not block claims for a company’s own negligence. If a rental agency knowingly rented a car with faulty brakes, ignored a tire recall, skipped required maintenance, or failed to remove a vehicle with open safety defects, that conduct may form the basis of a direct negligence claim. Claims may also arise from negligent entrustment, such as handing keys to someone who lacked a valid license or showed obvious signs of impairment at the counter. Each of these theories depends on proof, so preserving records and securing witness statements matters from day one.

Pedestrian Killed On Bee Ridge Road

Published on: October 17, 2025 | by Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada, P.A.

A deadly car vs pedestrian crash shut down Bee Ridge Road near Beneva Road on the morning of September 26, 2025. Reports indicate a 19-year-old driver traveling east struck a 76-year-old man who was crossing the eastbound lanes. Emergency responders pronounced the pedestrian deceased at the scene, and the Florida Highway Patrol Traffic Homicide Unit opened an investigation. If you walk in Florida, this loss underscores the risks you face and the rights you can exercise after a serious collision. This guide explains liability, insurance, and the steps you should take to protect against a claim.

Florida Pedestrian Accident Liability And How Fault Is Decided

Florida law requires drivers to use reasonable care, remain alert for pedestrians, and yield to pedestrians lawfully occupying a crosswalk. Investigators evaluate key facts to determine fault, including lane position, signal phases, driver speed, lighting and weather, visibility of signage, and whether either party violated traffic rules. You should know that Florida applies modified comparative negligence to most negligence claims. If a jury finds you 50 percent or less at fault, you can still recover damages reduced by your percentage of fault. If you are found more than 50 percent at fault, recovery for pain and suffering is barred. Careful investigation often changes early assumptions about who bears responsibility.

Florida Appeals Court Clarifies Causation in Bad Faith Insurance Claims

Published on: October 11, 2025 | by Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada, P.A.

A new opinion from the Florida Second District Court of Appeals offers necessary clarification for policyholders and injury victims pursuing bad-faith insurance claims. In Hancock v. Florida Farm Bureau General Insurance Company, the court addressed how juries should evaluate causation, specifically, whether the insurer’s conduct, rather than the insured’s own actions, caused excess damages beyond policy limits.

This ruling reinforces that proving bad faith in Florida depends on showing a direct link between the insurer’s failure to act reasonably and the harm suffered by the insured. The decision also highlights how careful claim handling, clear communication, and timely settlement offers can prevent unnecessary litigation.

Causation and Liability in Florida Personal Injury Insurance Disputes

The dispute arose after an automobile accident led to a personal injury claim against the insured. The injured party made a settlement demand within policy limits, but the insurer failed to accept the offer before it expired. When a jury later awarded damages far above the policy limit, the insured sued the insurer for bad faith, arguing that the company’s delay and lack of clear communication caused the excess judgment.

Miami I-95 Crash Near Ives Dairy Road Highlights Dangers Of Highway Collisions

Published on: September 30, 2025 | by Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada, P.A.

On Monday morning, a serious accident brought traffic to a standstill on I-95 near Ives Dairy Road. According to reports, multiple vehicles were involved in the crash, which caused significant delays for drivers in Miami-Dade County. Emergency crews worked to clear the scene, but the collision raised concerns for motorists who travel one of South Florida’s busiest stretches of highway.

For you and your family, this incident is a reminder of how quickly an ordinary commute can turn into a life-changing event. Multi-vehicle crashes often result in serious injuries, complicated insurance claims, and disputes over fault. Understanding your rights after a collision like this one is essential to protecting your health and your financial stability.

Why Highway Accidents Create Severe Risks

Highways like I-95 carry thousands of cars, trucks, and motorcycles every day at high speeds. When one driver makes a mistake, the results can be devastating. Collisions on these roads often involve multiple vehicles, chain-reaction impacts, and rollovers. The force of impact can cause traumatic injuries such as broken bones, head trauma, spinal cord damage, and internal bleeding.

Florida Court Rejects Medical Malpractice Claim Due to Statute of Limitations Error

Published on: September 17, 2025 | by Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada, P.A.

A July 2025 decision from the Third District Court of Appeal highlights the critical importance of timing in medical negligence cases. In Daisha Ervin v. Sergio A. Alvarez, M.D., et al., the court affirmed the dismissal of a malpractice complaint after finding the claimant failed to file within legal deadlines. If you believe you were harmed by medical treatment, you must consider both the discovery rule and the hard statute of limitations.

Medical malpractice claims in Florida must be filed within two years from the time the injury is or reasonably should be discovered, or within four years of the negligent act itself. In this case, the patient argued she only learned of the harm years after treatment. The court rejected that as a basis for extension because supporting evidence did not meet the legal threshold.

How the Court’s Ruling Reinforces Deadline Discipline

Your right to compensation depends not only on injury but also on procedural compliance. Florida’s statute requires timely action and allows limited exceptions when delayed discovery applies. However, the claimant cannot rely on vague or retrospective awareness. The court requires evidence that a reasonably diligent person could not have known of the harm earlier.